Simulating Professions (SP) with Large Language Models (LLMs) has shown promising potential in education, healthcare, law, and other domains. However, the moral and ethical behavior of LLMs in educator roles remains underexplored. In this work, we introduce EMNLP (Educator-role Moral and Normative LLMs Profiling), a comprehensive framework for evaluating personality traits, moral development stages, and harmful content risk in teacher-role LLMs. EMNLP integrates an extended teacher personality scale (CPST-E), a diverse set of 88 moral dilemmas specific to the teaching context, and a soft prompt injection module targeting four moral flaw dimensions. Through experiments on 12 LLMs, we uncover key trends: teacher SP LLMs tend to exhibit idealized yet emotionally muted personality profiles, perform well in abstract ethical reasoning but poorly in emotionally nuanced scenarios, and show a tradeoff between reasoning strength and robustness against prompt-based role manipulation. Additionally, we evaluate the impact of temperature settings on behavioral consistency. Our results highlight the need for finer-grained alignment strategies to ensure ethical behavior in high-stakes educational simulations.